Friday, May 3, 2013

Ethics and Desire in Contemporary Levantine Literature

During the last lecture, Professor Kifah Hanna from Trinity College spoke to the class on literature in the Middle East.  I have always been very fascinated with Middle Eastern and Islamic culture, so I particularly enjoyed this lecture as well as the Tunisian film lecture.  Hanna focuses mostly on literature in the east Mediterranean area such as Syria and Lebanon- predominately Arabic countries.  The main topics that Hanna focuses on in Levantine literature are the victimization of homosexuality and women.

The first poet that Hanna discusses is Abu Nuwas.  Nuwas focuses mainly on the love of wine and the love of boys in his poems.  His poetry mostly has a hedonistic feel in them.  During the time that Abu Nuwas was writing, there was a major underground movement in his Arabic culture.  The underground movement consisted of men speaking more freely of their sexual desires for men and boys.  Because Islamic culture is very strict, and emphasizes that this is wrong and that men should be masculine and dominant, people could not discuss this in open forums-only amongst themselves.  Nuwas wrote very explicitly and graphically of his lustful fantasies, which ultimately were written for common people.  This is important because this shows sexual desires can be somewhat more freely expressed by the common folk because this allowed common people to gain information on such topics that they could not learn elsewhere like the rich.  While Nuwas openly expressed his homosexual desires, he still always maintained that the act was wrong.  Rather than supporting the underground movement, he more so explained it to be a brief occurrence happening among Arabic men that will stop eventually (even though it really doesn't).  Essentially Abu Nuwas was the catalyst for questioning sexuality and gender roles in the Arabic community.  This time period can be described as redefining morality and questioning ethics that are different from western Europeans.

The second author that Professor Hanna touched upon briefly is Layla Ba'Albaki.  Layla Ba'Albaki was a famous poet in Lebanon, and she is known for leading the sexual revolution for women.  Traditionally in Arabic culture women are victimized because they have to repress many types of freedoms especially their sexual freedoms.  For example, many Arabic women must wear a veil over their head, so that they are not seen as sexy or seductive.  Ba'Albaki wrote many books throughout the 1950's and 1960's; however, most of them were banned.  Ba’Albaki’s books were very progressive and feminist for strict Arabic culture.  She often wrote about her female characters not wanting to have children, and desiring a naked man’s body.  Both these things are very outlandish for Arabic women to traditionally talk about since they should be conservative.  Therefore, she was taken to court, and her books were banned for being deemed inappropriate.

The third author that Professor Hanna discussed is Huda Barakat.  Barakat is very reputable author in the Middle East and in her books, she often writes about male homosexuality.  Barakat is noted for not only giving recognition to male homosexuality, but also for remaining genderless when she writes to give an unbiased perspective.  One quote from Barakat is “We are both male and female and yet at the same time well beyond either.”  This quote is important for two reasons.  For one, it shows how Barakat is able to separate herself in her writing to write freely of male homosexuality, which made her writing more popular.  Also, this shows how the sexual revolution that was taking place in the Middle East was because more people were starting to understand that gender and sexuality are just restricted labels.  Peoples’ desires go far beyond just being male or female or heterosexual.  Barakat, among other authors during this time period, ultimately tried to deconstruct and then reconstruct the peoples’ definition of sexuality.

Just as a personal thought from the discussion in lecture- the topic of belly dancers peaked my interest.  Professor Hanna stated that belly dancers are looked down upon with a stigma in Arabic culture and most often times are not even Arabic women, but rather are foreigners.  Coming from a feminist and American point of view, as well as having watched the Tunisian film in a previous lecture, I still firmly believe that women have more sexual freedom because Arabic men are so easily swayed by sexuality from Arabic women.  Therefore, Arabic women ultimately have the power, which is why I feel like belly dancing should not be stigmatized in their culture.  But even if belly dancing is not the best profession to have, my other thought is: Why would Arabic people allow their culture and traditions to be practiced by foreigners.  Whether people like belly dancing or not, it is a major part of their culture and is a beautiful art form.  I personally think that they would want to preserve that amongst the Arabic culture and have only Arabic women belly dance as tradition.  Overall, I enjoyed this lecture, and it was very refreshing to discuss another very different culture from American culture!   
     


No comments:

Post a Comment